The Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) wants to strengthen buy-to-let underwriting standards by insisting on a minimum level of stress testing, in the latest crackdown on amateur landlords.
A consultation paper on the future of buy-to-let underwriting says that the market is defined by short-term interest-only mortgages that leave consumers vulnerable to hikes in base rate.
The paper suggests lenders should consider future interest rate rises for at least the first five years of any buy-to-let mortgage. The exception would be unless the interest rate is fixed for more than five years, or if the overall mortgage contract is less than five years.
The move is the latest crackdown on the buy-to-let market, which has seen government cuts to tax relief and an increase to stamp duty rates for landlords.
The PRA suggests lenders should pay attention to:
- Market expectations
- A minimum increase of 2 per cent in buy-to-let mortgage interest rates
- Any Financial Policy Committee announcements around appropriate interest rate stress tests for buy-to-let
The PRA paper adds that lenders should assume a minimum borrower interest rate of 5.5 per cent.
The paper says: “The proposals on affordability testing aim to improve the safety and soundness of PRA regulated firms by ensuring that they take full account of any potential interest rate rises in their buy-to-let underwriting assessment.
“This will help curtail inappropriately risky and imprudent lending – loans that are affordable under the current low interest rates environment but will quickly become unaffordable if and when interest rates rise – and lower potential credit losses and repossession costs.
“As a result, these proposals are also expected to help insulate the lenders, the financial sector and wider economy from the impact of negative shocks in the housing market.”
The PRA is also proposing that all firms use an affordability test when assessing buy-to-let applications, either in the form of an interest coverage ratio test or an income affordability test that takes into account a borrowers’ personal income.
It is seeking to establish a standard set of variables that should be used within either form of affordability test, meaning lenders give consideration to:
- All costs associated with renting out the property where the landlord is responsible for payments
- Any tax liability associated with the property; and
- Where personal income is being used to support the rent, the borrower’s income tax, national insurance payments, credit commitments, committed expenditure, essential expenditure and living costs
However, the PRA is clear that it is not proposing supervisory guidance for LTV standards, though it says it expects firms to have “appropriate controls in place to monitor, manage and mitigate the risks of higher LTV lending”.
The paper also wants to define what a ‘portfolio landlord’ is. It suggests a good definition is someone with at least four mortgaged buy-to-let properties across all lenders.
The paper adds: “The PRA is expecting that firms conducting lending to portfolio landlords do so according to a specialist underwriting process that accounts for the complex nature of the borrower and their portfolio of properties.”
The changes are the latest move in a string of Government crackdowns on the buy-to-let and wider mortgage market.
In December the Treasury published a consultation on giving the FPC powers of direction over the buy-to-let market, like it has over the owner-occupied market. The market is still waiting for the outcome of the FPC consultation.
The Chancellor has also been targeting buy-to-let landlords with tax relief and stamp duty changes.
In his emergency Budget last July, Osborne announced cuts to tax relief on buy-to-let homes and from 2017 relief for buy-to-let landlords will be gradually cut to 20 per cent from the current maximum of 40 or 45 per cent.
In the 2015 Autumn Statement the Chancellor added a 3 percentage point surcharge to stamp duty for buy-to-let properties, starting from 1 April 2016.