Keydata declared in default by FSCS
The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) has confirmed that Keydata Investment Services is in default and it will now consider claims for compensation.
The FSCS will start sending application forms to customers of the firm and consider claims for compensation.
Keydata was placed into administration on June 8 and since then the FSCS has worked closely with the firm’s administrators PricewaterhouseCoopers, the FSA and HM Revenue and Customs to understand the full implications of the failure of the firm for its customers.
FSCS has identified two potential claim categories, and anticipates the vast majority of customers who invested in the Secure Income Bond Issues 1,2,3 (Category 1) will be eligible for compensation.
A number of these investments were sold as Isas by Keydata, but HMRC has confirmed they did not meet the necessary requirements to qualify.
HMRC has issued a statement reassuring customers in Keydata Isa products they will not be “out of pocket” as a result of the company selling non-compliant Isas.
Clients who did not invest in Isa products are now also able to bring a claim for compensation
Clients who did not invest in Isa products are now also able to bring a claim for compensation to the FSCS.
The FSCS says these investors may still have grounds for a successful claim against Keydata if it can be established that the firm caused them to suffer a financial loss—even though it has not as yet been able to establish that the apparent loss of the underlying assets results in any liability on Keydata’s part.
It says: “These claims will be considered by the FSCS on a case by case basis in light of an investor’s dealings with Keydata.”
The FSCS will shortly send application forms to all Keydata customers who invested in these ‘Category One’ products to enable them to make a claim for compensation.
Investors in Category One products who have not received a form by the end of November should contact the FSCS helpline on 020 7892 7300 or 0800 678 1100.
FSCS says the second category of potential claim relates to Isa investments in products including the Secure Income Bond Issue 4, the Secure Income Plan Issues 1 to 12 and 14, the Defined Income Plan Issues 1 to 8 and the Income Plan Issues 1 to 12 and 14.
HMRC has confirmed that these ‘Category Two’ products, which were promoted as Isa eligible, do not meet the requirements. This only affects Isa products which had a term of five years or less. There are approximately 16,000 investors in these affected funds.
For the period before Keydata went into administration, investors will not have to pay any tax because HMRC will pursue recovery of the tax from Keydata itself.
For the period following administration, the FSCS anticipates that the majority of investors in these plans will be eligible for compensation in respect of any tax losses incurred as a result of the fact that these investments were not Isa-qualifying.
The FSCS expects to write to affected investors with details of the claims process by the end of December
The FSCS and HMRC are developing a process whereby the FSCS would pay compensation on behalf of eligible investors to HMRC each year, avoiding the requirement for investors to pay the tax to HMRC upfront and later claim it from the FSCS.
The FSCS expects to write to affected investors with details of the claims process by the end of December.
Earlier this year PwC confirmed that evidence suggested that the underlying assets held in the secure income bond issues had been liquidated and may have been misappropriated.
In June, Keydata said it was an “innocent victim” after administrator PwC revealed over £100m of assets from some of the plans had gone missing. The assets were invested in Keydata plans with Luxembourg investment vehicle SLS Capital which was controlled by businessman David Elias who died in May.






Readers' comments (3)
Mrs Patricia MUir | 8 Feb 2010 2:59 pm
I AM ONE OF THE MANY CATEGORY 2 INVESTORS WHO NOW DO NOT KNOW IF THERE ORIGINAL INVESTMENT IS SAFE (RE LIFEMARK SHARES BEING SUSPENDED BY THE CSSF IN LUXEMBOURG) CANNOT GET AN ANSWER FROM EITHER PWC OR THE FSCS,WHO BY THE WAY HAVE JUST SENT US ALL FORMS TO FILL IN REGARDING THE TAX STATUS OF OUR MAXI ISA'S AND KEY DATA SOLD US THESE PLANS AS SECURE INCOME PLANS
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Brenda Setterfield | 23 Mar 2010 8:22 pm
Please please help. I don't have a clue what is going on. I have an SIB plan 7 year 7.
I have money invested in Direct Investment - which I don't know what this is and money in a Stocks & shares ISA.
I get no help from my financial advisor. I have to keep ringing him.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
sandra Bradley | 1 Apr 2010 7:50 pm
Having been advised by the IFA working at Norwich & Peterborough Building Society in Clacton on sea that an investment in Key Data was absolutely safe, they only sell them and advise their client to buy them as they are as "Safe as having your money in the building society" that they are specially structured for people who want their money somewhere that will grow with NO risk. Well obviously that was pie in the sky and now I am really concerned as I have nothing paid in from the investment for months now. Does anyone have any idea when the payments are going to re start on Key Data Products? While Price Waterhouse Cooper were involved the payments were going through and I was willing to go along with the fact that the ISA status would be sorted and that if I left the investments intact that eventually they would repay as per original investment terms. Is there anyone I can contact to find out? I did not have huge amounts invested as I am only an ordinary person who bought 2 ISAs £5000 and £7000 but that represents far more than my income for 1 year so you can see I am really concerned even if I am "Small Fry" in the investment world. I would welcome any help that I could be given as , as I said I felt more secure when Price Waterhouse Cooper were looking after the investigations and could actually be phoned up to ask what was happening, but now I don’t know where to turn to for help as our Norwich & Peterborough Building Society branch has closed down and when I telephoned their Head Office I was told there was no-one who could advise me.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment